The fact of the matter is that writing - whether it's for freshman English, a chemistry report, or an application letter - takes significant time and effort. Oh sure, there are writing assignments that we think of as "easy" or at least easier than others (anyone know what
hubris means?), but any significant amount of content creation can be a real resource drain. In addition to the time and effort writing takes, there's also the issue of commitment. If you're not committed to the process, to the content, perhaps to a belief in the merit of what you're writing, that's going to become apparent to the reader, and that ALWAYS leads to problems.
So, in this information age, where nearly every technology we design and use is aimed at speeding up our communicative process (
OMG, i
tlk fstr?
LOL!),
should our goal be simply to figure out the fastest writing process and go with it?
I came across
an interesting blog post by a writer named Dave Fleet. In it, Fleet talks about blogs vs. Twitter, both of which
we've talked about, at least a little. A fair summation of his stance on a business'
understand of blogs reads like this:
Blogs are a lot of work. To really pull it off consistently one has to have a strategy, enough content to write consistently AND the desire to even do it. But before even starting with a blog, blogging itself needs to first be recognized as valuable by upper management (which I think is still not even close to being a reality), controllable by middle management (in terms of helping/guiding the company blogger) and executable by staff willing/able to do it. And this, I think is where everything stalls. . .before it ever even gets started. . .
In my opinion, the perceived TIME it takes to create a blog isn’t a factor…it’s the EFFORT.
So, is our goal to reach as many people (or perhaps as many of the right kinds of people) as possible? If so, Y?
bothA dedicating d
tym n
ef4T 2
ritN thorough content.
In only kind-of related news, after you look up hubris (and you should), notice that there's an ISP in Kansas called
Hubris Communications. What were those folks thinking?