So, on Thursday, my ENG 2353 class will talk about music (and a little TV) and the implications of those media converging with (existing despite?) the interwebs. Serendipity (zing!) perhaps provided me an article today featuring Mark Hunter, the lead singer of Ohio-based metal band Chimaira and his views on some of the challenges created by (among other things) that convergence.
It's definitely a subjective view, but I think that he offers some potential insight into a set of industry-wide trends. His claims go beyond merely the convergence of these media, but he does talk specifically about the internet's impact on music - genre notwithstanding. Also, I'm interested in the fact that Hunter is a frequent tweeter.
Anyway, food for thought.
Showing posts with label twitter. Show all posts
Showing posts with label twitter. Show all posts
Tuesday, October 11, 2011
Thursday, July 23, 2009
Finally, a medium worthy of politics
I just read this article about Governors Palin and Schwarzenegger tweeting about ethics charges and failed economies (respectively). I said to myself, I said, "Self, is 140 characters really enough to adequately address 'real world' issues?"
There is such a ridiculous rush to "adopt" Twittering (even though the technology is years old... way to stay current, Favorite News Corporation), that I wonder if new users even think about the rhetorical ramifications of their tweets. When, if ever, are 140 characters sufficient to deliver meaning? Well, I suppose that could be enough space to "say" something meaningful , but it takes a pretty skilled rhetorician. And even if a rhetorician is skilled enough, boiling complex issues down to tweets like
seems dangerously reductive. That's from soon-to-be-ex-Gov. Sarah Palin's twitter-stream, the bulk of which is being celebrated on Gawker.
While you're thinking about it, feel free to twitter your congressperson and/or follow their tweets at tweetcongress.com.
There is such a ridiculous rush to "adopt" Twittering (even though the technology is years old... way to stay current, Favorite News Corporation), that I wonder if new users even think about the rhetorical ramifications of their tweets. When, if ever, are 140 characters sufficient to deliver meaning? Well, I suppose that could be enough space to "say" something meaningful , but it takes a pretty skilled rhetorician. And even if a rhetorician is skilled enough, boiling complex issues down to tweets like
Re inaccurate story floating re:ethics violation/Legal Defense Fund;matter is still pending;new info was just requested even;no final report.
seems dangerously reductive. That's from soon-to-be-ex-Gov. Sarah Palin's twitter-stream, the bulk of which is being celebrated on Gawker.
While you're thinking about it, feel free to twitter your congressperson and/or follow their tweets at tweetcongress.com.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)